Click on image to see larger view
George McNeil: "Herbatim", 1987, oil on canvas, 78x98 in.
George McNeil: "Dancer #23", 1971, oil on canvas, 60x56 in.
George McNeil: "Resolution", 1980, oil on canvas, 68x56 in.
George McNeil: "Now Street #1", 1990, oil on canvas, 64x70 in.
|
As a student at the New York Studio School, I sometimes
sat in on an art history class taught by George McNeil,
and I often left frustrated by assertions such as
"Chardin hadn't discovered color." When I took his
drawing class, however, I understood how McNeil's
adherence to Hans Hofmann's teachings could be
liberating. He stressed working from "tension points"
in the set-up before us. Using them to suggest
configurations in space, we compressed their volumes
into abstract shapes of color, from which, if we were
observant, a figure might emerge. McNeil worked along
with us, and we occasionally glanced at his drawing, an
alchemical soup of charcoal awash in liquid media. And
indeed, at the end, a figure materialized; I remember
one in particular, caught in action as though fleeing
the scene. There was humor, perhaps something Irish
Catholic, in this combination of hedonism and dogma, in
a procedure that combined expressionist abandon with a
scholastic hierarchy of symbolic structures.
.
Later, I visited McNeil's studio and saw the similar
pile of everyday objects that served as his "model".
There was something compelling in his transformation of
the dross of everyday life into ecstatic imagery. At a
time when painting in general, and constructing figures
in particular, was suspect -– de Kooning himself having
turned increasingly from women to abstracted landscapes
-– McNeil devised a way to purify his figures by a
passage through abstraction. Using his "tension
points" to generate configurations of shapes, he leads
us through the picture plane, into a realm of purely
plastic invention.
Included in the survey of McNeil's work at
Salander-O'Reilly were early abstract paintings and
some of the heroic figures of the 1970s. Born of a
rhythmic process, these often assumed the guise of
dancers. Tokens of a process of transformation, they
aim to escape convention, to court the grotesque, to
pin down what de Kooning called a "slipping glimpse".
McNeil's dancers and the questing figure of
"Resolution" (1980) hark back to the founding impulse
of abstract expressionism, to its search for the
archetypal and mythic underpinnings of modern life.
A second room featured later figures from the 1980s,
when McNeil achieved a virtuosic fluidity. McNeil
finds symbolic potency in fluids - changeable,
mutating. transformative; figures emerge in lush,
liquid suspension, and they accumulate a welter of
accessories related to the urban scene ("Herbatim",
1987). McNeil, who died in 1995, seemed exhilarated by
pop vulgarity, and perhaps by the commercial success he
enjoyed late in his life. "Now Street" (1990) adds
graffiti and lettering to its collage-like mixture of
vernacular imagery.
The figures in both phases of McNeil's art seem equally
realized, fully embodied in painterly form. Both
groups partake of their time and context. An innocent,
celebratory impulse emerges in the later paintings -
for all their Dionysian abandon, they have more in
common with children's drawings than with de Kooning's
more visceral women. The more austere early figures,
on the other hand, distinguish themselves by a heroic
dignity worthy of McNeil's isolated struggle to carry
forward the legacy of modernism. In transforming the
figure, McNeil elevates image-making, and the visual
imagination, to a new level, and lends it a modernist
pedigree.
|