To those of us at the entry-level classes at Cooper
Union in the late fifties there were two teachers who
seemed to have a handle on the explosive world of
abstract painting that had taken over the then current
art world.
The galleries and museums were filled with
magnificently flamboyant paintings. There was some
underlying secret to all this work and we uninitiated
could just look and marvel. It was in the classes of
Charles Cajori and Nicolas Carone that we began to
understand the structuring and theory that fueled this
painting renaissance. It all had to do with plastic
space and the play between reality and abstraction.
When I look at the work of Cajori I see a strong
affirmation of all the ideas he presented to his
classes . Cajori has maintained artistic excellence
and continued style over his long career and has
produced a large body of work.
A recent show at David Findlay Jr. is a survey of
fifty years of his work. One gets a chance to observe
the formation of a style both forward looking and
referential to the past. In his early watercolors he
is clearly looking at the spatial advances begun by
Cezanne in the nineteenth century, highly abstracted
yet grounded in tabletop still life. The overall image
is flattened out and yet it conveys a sense of movement
as his forms retreat into the nether regions of the
picture plane.
He paints a slippery space. Things seem to slide
through the pictures as he establishes positions for
his forms. Positioning is one of his main activities..
There is an ambiguity between abstraction and observed
form. His dominant theme is the figure and it's
surrounding environment.
Over the years he has been committed to drawing and
painting the human figure. A 1962 untitled painting
presents an image that lays in-between a spatial
diagram and a figurative representation. One must
enter this picture with a spirit of openness and
assemble the figurative situation using both logic and
imagination. It truly engages the viewer in the battle
between figuration and abstraction and at the same time
presents a powerful pictorial statement.
Over the years he becomes more focused on the human
aspect of his figures. In later paintings the figures
are given faces. I must admit that to me this is a
welcome addition. It increases the tension between the
persona of his figures and specific spatial design of
his pictures.
The direct painting technique he uses does not allow
for any modeling or form description. rather it is
flat and planar, building depth with overlapping planes
and at times pure visceral color impact employing that
push and pull Hofmann championed.
One must acknowledge the towering accomplishment of his
work. Consistent and ever inventive and yet true to a
tradition of modernism established in the twentieth
century.
|