|
Minerva, Model (Elizabeth Hellman), and Artist Demonstrate in Petrosino Square Plaza
|
The Battle of Petrosino Square
A war of sorts has broken out between two
improbable belligerent parties around a little-known
pocket park in Lower Manhattan, Petrosino Square.
On the one side are some of the immediately local residents
of the rather unusual neighborhood that surrounds the park; on the other,
the Greenwashing Department of Citibank. The central issue
is the Citibike installation in the park's plaza, which has
preempted a space intended and used for large public works
of art.
|
Transmission...
|
First, a little geography, history, and dramatis
personae: Petrosino Square, is named for
a heroic character of of yesteryear,
Lieutenant Joseph Petrosino, who was
active around the beginning of the 20th
Century and was the first New York City
police officer to die in the line of
duty outside the country (he was killed
in Palermo, Sicily, in 1909, during
operations against the Mafia or Black
Hand). It is a small triangle formed
by the junction of Kenmare Street,
Lafayette Street, and Centre Street,
with its apex at Spring Street, just
north of the old Police Headquarters
in Lower Manhattan. Since it is too
small to build on, it has contained a
tiny park for many decades. Out of
the way of the storms of Manhattan
development and destruction frenzies,
even a few dusty trees grew.
|
... of ...
|
People who were around back in the day will remember
when this area was considerably scruffier than it is
today; it was part of Little Italy, and as the Little
Italians moved to the suburbs it became increasingly
derelict, which was going some. It became a place
where people moved because the rents were low, the
neighborhood quiet, the rich and their business far,
but not too far, away. (One needs work, clients, buyers,
as well as low rent.) The city was happy to ignore
the inhabitants and the park, and so it spent a few
decades gently deteriorating. In the realm of the arts,
back when officially sanctified art was up on 57th Street, some of the now-famed
'Downtown Scene' occurred around here. Bohos lounged,
artists did art, Happenings happened, the savvier tourists
came by. Otherwise, most of the time, Petrosino Square was
just a place where where a weary wino, street person, or local
minimum-wage slave could rest from his labors for a
while without being told to move along.
|
... gesture.
|
In the last few years, however, the area has been
radically assaulted by gentrification, part of
the Soho maelstrom. And the city fathers and
their big-ticket real-estate friends do not want
the high-rent-paying, condo-buying, much-better-
off-thank-you people who have descended on the area
to have to put up with scruffy parks or scruffy
people. Therefore, the park was shaped up and made
quite spiffy. Some of the trees were allowed
to remain in a fenced-off section; the rest was
turned into a sort of plaza, that is, an open area
paved with large elegant bricks. For a time, the
plaza-like part of the revamped park became a site
for the installation of large public works of art,
perhaps as a sort of nod to the now-fading cultural
history of the area (which nevertheless still houses
many artists, bohemians, and cranks from the old days
hanging on here and there, not yet all kicked out.)
Concerned neighbors were assured that this was its
intended future use.
|
Picture of Installation from The Villager
|
One of the holdouts of the old order has been Minerva Durham, who
has operated Spring Studio in a basement on, of
course, Spring Street for the last 20 years or so.
At Spring Studio people mostly do Life Drawing, that
is, they draw pictures of naked people, an ancient
tradition which has had a considerable revival with
the resurrection of figurative art. (Full disclosure:
I am one of these people.) Minerva Durham is cool
enough to have been mentioned in a David Sedaris
story. She is a very active participant in local
matters; for example, she and several other residents
and business proprietors vigorously objected to and
thus blocked a pseudo-pushcart in the park intended
to sell upscale goodies, as if there weren't already
a dozen upscale-goodie stores within a hundred feet or
so; Starbuck's is right down the block. Although the
mallification of the city has mostly overrun much of
the general area, Minerva and her allies reasonably
thought they could defend at least this
little oasis of noncommerciality.
But in late April, His Excellency Mayor Bloomberg,
some people at Citibank, and some other entrepreneurs of
the new new world, suddenly and arbitrarily repurposed
the plaza of Petrosino Square: it has now become
totally a landing area for the commercial operation
of the rent-a-bike racks we have all heard a lot about,
a sort of gigantic billboard with little detachable
billboards you can ride around on for a price.
Most such installations have taken up street space
formerly used for parking cars, but an actual park
is a something quite different, and I think its
arbitrary appropriation reveals the
principles of the Citibike operation, which are not to supplant
motor vehicles with bicycles but to pull off some kind
of greenwashing commercial or public-relations stunt
on behalf of those who are financing or enabling it.
After all, if the city had wanted to encourage
cycling beyond painting lines on the street, they
could have long since installed non-commercial bike
racks in these same parking spaces, and told the
police to dial back the very special attention they
have been giving to non-commercial cyclists in
recent years.
The fact that a bank would choose bicycles to do
greenwashing duty is not at all surprising. There is
a process sometimes called appropriation
in which a practice started by
marginal people is taken up by those who are 'better'
and more important, and institutionalized -- made
part of the state -- often to the exclusion of the
very people who began it. Sometimes appropriation is
merely the adoption of an attractive idea, but often
it is accompanied by a vague redolence of righteousness
deriving from its origin among the lowly (which doesn't
include inviting any of them along).
Back in the 1960s, for example, 'hippies' and other
slum children voluntarily cleared out some vacant lots
and made gardens out of them, some of them, real
horticultural works of art. Real estate people
were not slow to notice these projects improved
'values' (that is, increased the rents and sale
prices they could get from buyers and tenants).
The authorities and their powers were rung in.
Now, many of these gardens have strong fences
around them, with locked gates, open only to a
select membership, and certainly not to scruffy,
low-rent hippies; some have even been taken into
the City Parks system and are managed by it. Another
example: Food Not Bombs handed out food to people in parks and
other public places; they were soon imitated by City
Harvest, and it was made illegal (in theory) for the
unorganized and unchartered to give people free food.
And bicycles, which were once used almost exclusively
by deliverymen, messengers, and other poor people,
under the pressure of a deteriorating environment,
have become every politician's and bureaucrat's favored choice
of transportation for other people. There is even a
second, more specific appropriation here: the idea
of shared bicycles clearly descends from the white
bicycles of Amsterdam, which were left on the streets
for free use by hippie anarchists in years gone by. No
free-stuff anarchists need apply to the present operation,
however!
In the presently succeeding stage of appropriation,
privately-owned bicycles are now going to have to make
room for advertising-laden corporate bicycles ridden
by fee-paying users. Criticism is to be deflected by the
'green' aura that has been attached to the bicycles;
if you're against anything the city and Citibank have
done, as, for instance, billboarding Petrosino Square,
you must love giant SUVs and the presumably piggy
people who drive them. And you have been
officially tut-tutted by the Editorial Board of the New York
Times, no doubt a terrifying fate if the Times
is your daily scripture.
All this should catch you up on the particulars of the
present drama.
The next voice you hear will be Minerva's. This is a letter
which she sent to the media and various persons and organizations
concerned with the issues shortly before the racks were
loaded and opened for business.
Since Saturday, April 28, I have been protesting
the theft of the art installation space in
Petrosino Square by the New York City Department of
Transportation and Citibank. The City administrators
and the corporate bank have placed bike-share docking
stations on top of the officially designated space for
Public Art. Georgette Fleischer and I had stopped
the bike-rack installation on Thursday night, April
27th, but DOT secretly placed the racks during the
middle of Friday night.
If bikes are operating from the stations on Memorial
Day weekend , Saturday, May 25, I will lock Spring
Studio for one week or until the bikes are removed,
whichever comes sooner. In good weather I will have
classes outside with a nearly nude or nude model,
depending upon the model's fearlessness. I will leave
messages on the phone, 212-226-7240 about the times
for the sessions in the park. I will have all of the
morning classes in the park if it is not raining. They
will be free to anyone who wishes to draw. I will
also bring free materials for passersby. The studio
will be open for Karen Capelluto's show during the
gallery hours, 5:00 to 6:00 pm, M-F. If the bikes
remain I will reopen downstairs on Saturday, June 1,
raise the prices, and cancel all plans to stay in
New York City beyond the two-and-a-half years left
on my lease here at 64 Spring Street.
The historic reasons for an art installation space
here in this Park are overwhelming. The fact that
the Park was derelict in appearance but inviting
to avant-garde and experimental artists since 1985
makes it a sacred place for everyone who is aware
that their artistic output was influenced by the
Fluxus movement. Just about everyone who makes
art today, as well as most performing artists,
express Fluxus ideas.. Think of Lady Gaga and her
elaborate settings. Even the newspaper reports of my
protest are couched in Fluxus concepts and language:
"Elizabeth Hellman's ballet-inspired protest..." and
"In typical SoHo artist style, a woman is staging a
protest near the bike rack, standing in a statuesque
pose every day..." I love these descriptions that
assign empowerment to the performer herself, to the
genuine and truthful intention of an artist who moves
and communicates. That vision of the artist comes
right out of SoHo.
The idealistic thrust of the artists' settlement in
the loft buildings in the cast-iron district was
central to the economics and politics of Virginia
Admiral, the woman who organized 226 Lafayette in
the early 1970's. It is thanks to her, my friend who
died in 2001, that I have my business in the basement
here. Before she died, she said,"Keep Minerva in
the basement," a statement that could be viewed with
sisterly cynicism or with a sense of humor that knows
the value of real estate. The corner of Spring at
Lafayette is to me the most valuable real estate in
the world. But it will lose all of its value and
charm if it becomes a bicycle depot. How did I get
to be so lucky to have spent 21 years working on this
corner? Now that the city has changed so much, is it
time for me to go away and die in a obscure corner?
Virginia wanted the Park to be green. She meant
plantings. It took years for the Park to be rebuilt
into the inviting space that it is now. The decision
was made to put art works out in the "PLAZA" area,
and to leave the fenced-in green area quiet, free of
even artistic speech. Outside, in the north triangle,
people gathered around the first work installed and
took pictures in a touristy way without annoying
the locals who live and work here and who sit in the
enclosed green space. Actually, I think that most of
the locals were proud that tourists were enjoying the
art. There are many Parks Department papers proving
that the north triangle of Petrosino is designated
for temporary art exhibitions.
Besides the historic, philosophic, and esthetic
arguments for the removal of the bike stations and
for the insistence on the continued presence of
Art in Pertosino Square, there is a more profound
and potentially more volatile reason to keep bike
shares out of the park. For me it is the ultimate
right-of-way turf war. I have been walking along the
side of the park for over thirty years. For twenty of
those years I have walked to my business at 64 Spring
Street. I have rarely encountered mounted bicyclists
on the pavement. If the bikes are being parked and
taken out, my pleasant walk to work will become a
hazardous journey. Already, the presence of the bike
racks has opened up the possibility to many riders
that they may ride on the sidewalk which is Park
land and not a bike path. As I do my protest daily,
I call out to mounted riders to "please walk your
bike." One man stayed on the sidewalk, still mounted,
then circled back in the street and called out to me,
"I know you. I used to live where you live at 86
Kenmare, and you are easily the most annoying person
in world." Half an hour later I saw him riding in
the street in the bike lane and we both smiled and
waved at each other. Another said that I need to get
laid. (Everyone needs to get laid.)
My problem is with Mayor Bloomberg, the DOT and
Citibank. While many people are working on this, I
feel that I have my own little war with them. It is
either them or me. And, hey, he spends his weekends
in Bermuda, while I am here all week long, and the
weekends too. I was willing to go to jail to stop the
pushcart from operating in the park, but I will die
for this outrageous violation of the law and of the
will of the local residents, both renters and owners
of property, and shopkeepers who share with me the
traditional cultural values of New York City.
I am asking you, all the people I know and love,
all of those who love the studio, to support the
accomplishments of the art movement that occurred in
SoHo at the end of the last century and to insist to
Mayor Bloomberg, the DOT and Citibank that Petrosino
Square be protected from commercial activity and
from moving vehicular traffic (bikes), and that its
front triangle be supported as the Parks Department
has designated it to be, as a space devoted to art
installations. I am asking those of you who have
power and connections to do what you can. If you
can't help me in this, I will have done everything
in my power, and I will be living with a deep sense
of disappointment and disillusion.
Thank you,
Minerva
Thus far Minerva's activism -- besides inspiring the
local Community Board to protest, and bringing in the
local media -- has been to hold
drawing sessions in what's left of the park, and,
the attention of passers-by, tourists, and residents
thus drawn, has passed out leaflets and gotten many
hundreds of people to sign petitions. Thus far
nothing has had any
visible effect on the city administration; after all,
few things unaccompanied by great power, wealth,
or celebrity do, even when only a piece of a little
out-of-the-way park is at stake. But the battle is
hardly over.
What does the future hold? There are various
competing forces impinging on this little park.
Gentrification, of course, sweeps all before it. But
in the broadest context, American capitalism and
empire are losing their grip and are being sustained
mainly by energetic money-printing, a tactic which
cannot be sustained indefinitely, although it has
certainly inflated the equities markets and kept
New York City real estate 'values' from collapsing.
On the other hand, the deterioration of the American
economy in the past has actually helped New York City,
as the better-off fled the Rust Belt and other sloughs
of despond to come to the remaining bright lights
and casino economy of Manhattan. The gentry who
are already here may be displacing the ancien
regime of Bohemia, but they presumably moved
to the area for its 'colorful character', not to be
close to a Citibank billboard. They will have divided
feelings which may be transmitted upward. The bureaucrats may
dig in their heels as a matter of sacred principle,
but they don't really have much to fight for. In any
case, unless there is a fix in,
that is, city submission to someone with influence and power who
strongly opposes the bike racks being in a particular
place to which they might be moved if they were not
left in the park, it would seem to be a simple matter
to move them a few hundred feet or less up or down
or across Lafayette Street. Perhaps it is the very
simplicity and reasonableness of this solution which
keeps it from being employed.
|
Our rapt audience, with our model and our writer-photographer
working out in the reflected background.
|
|